Info
🌱 來自: ALK
alki in nsclc
KFSYSCC Fellowship Tuesday Morning Journal Club
2023-12-12
Treatment of
ALK Translocation-Positive
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
(1)Presenter, 專研醫師, 和信治癌中心醫院腫瘤內科部
(2)Moderator, 主治醫師, 和信治癌中心醫院腫瘤內科部
Outline
- Clinical Scenario
- Introduction to ALK mutation
- Current ALK treatment landscape
- Crizotinib
- Alectinib
- Brigatinib
- Lorlatiib
- Lorlatiib toxicity
- ALKi resistance
- Take home messages
Clinical
Scenario
Patient 1 58-year-old man
:::free
- Lung cancer, RML,
- Adenocarcinoma,
- acinar predominant with pleural mets,
- s/p wedge resection on 2017/09/26 (義大)
- pT4NXM1a
- EGFR mutation(-), ALK(+) :::split
Treatment course
- crizotinib
- PD in 6 month
- pemetrexed / carboplatin
- alectinib 2018~Now
- SD :::
ID: 05682406
Patient 2: 49-year-old man
- Lung cancer, Adenocarcinoma, RLL, cT3N3M1c with lung-lung and brain metastases and pleural seedings, EGFR(-), ALK(+), ROS1(-), s/p alectinib, stable disease
:::free
:::split
:::
Increasing number of FDA-approved drugs for treatment of oncogene-addicted NSCLC
Delahaye C, Figarol S, Pradines A, Favre G, Mazieres J, Calvayrac O. Early Steps of Resistance to Targeted Therapies in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Cancers. 2022;14(11):2613. doi:10.3390/cancers14112613
What is ALK?
Anaplastic lymphoma kinase and ALK inhibitors
Huang H. Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Receptor Tyrosine Kinase: A Catalytic Receptor with Many Faces. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018;19(11):3448. doi:10.3390/ijms19113448
Domain structure of receptor tyrosine kinase families
Hallberg B, Palmer RH. Crizotinib - Latest Champion in the Cancer Wars? New England Journal of Medicine. 2010;363(18):1760-1762. doi:10.1056/NEJMe1010404
Gene fusion between EML4 and ALK
Soda M, Choi YL, Enomoto M, et al. Identification of the transforming EML4-ALK fusion gene in non-small-cell lung cancer. Nature. 2007;448(7153):561-566. doi:10.1038/nature05945
Signaling Pathways Activated by ALK Fusion Proteins
:::free :::split :::
Hallberg B, Palmer RH. Crizotinib - Latest Champion in the Cancer Wars? New England Journal of Medicine. 2010;363(18):1760-1762. doi:10.1056/NEJMe1010404
Schneider JL, Lin JJ, Shaw AT. ALK-positive lung cancer: a moving target. Nat Cancer. 2023;4(3):330-343. doi:10.1038/s43018-023-00515-0
Therapeutic Sequencing in ALK NSCLC
Elsayed M, Christopoulos P. Therapeutic Sequencing in ALK+ NSCLC. Pharmaceuticals. 2021;14(2):80. doi:10.3390/ph14020080
Crizotinib
1st generation ALKi
First-Line Crizotinib versus Chemotherapy in ALK-Positive Lung Cancer
:::columns 1. Design: - Phase 3 trial, Open-label - Multicenter, Randomized 2. 343 patients 3. Patients characteristics: - Advanced ALK-positive NSCLC - no previous systemic treatment :::split 4. Agent: - crizotinib (250 mg twice daily) in a 3-week cycle - pemetrexed (500 mg per square meter of body-surface area) or docetaxel (75 mg per square meter) every 3 weeks. 5. First-line treatment for advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer 6. Trial Name: PROFILE 1014 ::: > Solomon BJ, Mok T, Kim DW, et al. First-Line Crizotinib versus Chemotherapy in ALK-Positive Lung Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 2014;371(23):2167-2177. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1408440 ---
Outcome | Crizotinib | Chemotherapy |
---|---|---|
PFS (median) | 10.9 months | 7.0 months |
Response rate | 74% | 45% |
HR for progression or death | 0.45 | - |
Hazard ratio for death | 0.82 | - |
Solomon BJ, Mok T, Kim DW, et al. First-Line Crizotinib versus Chemotherapy in ALK-Positive Lung Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 2014;371(23):2167-2177. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1408440
Crizotinib in ROS1-Rearranged Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
:::free Median progression-free survival was 19.2 months :::split
- 50 patients
- Dx by NGS
- phase 1
- ORR: 72% :::
圍毆 - 梗圖產生 ↪ 器 (手工模式) . Accessed November 28, 2023. https://memes.tw/maker/painter/742
Alectinib
2nd generation of ALKi
ALEX
, J-ALEX
, ALESIA
, ALUR
Alectinib versus Crizotinib in Untreated ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
:::free
- Phase 3, Open-label
- Multicenter, Randomized
- 303 patients, 1:1
- untreated, advanced ALK+ NSCLC
- including those with asx CNS disease
- Agent:
- Alectinib 600 mg BID
- Crizotinib 250 mg BID
:::split
Outcome | Alectinib | Crizotinib |
---|---|---|
Investigator-assessed PFS (median) | Not reached | - |
12-month event-free survival rate | 68.4% | 48.7% |
Hazard ratio for disease progression or death | 0.47 | - |
Time to CNS progression (cause-specific HR) | 0.16 | - |
Objective response rate | 82.9% | 75.5% |
Grade 3 to 5 adverse events | 41% | 50% |
:::
Peters S, Camidge DR, Shaw AT, et al. Alectinib versus Crizotinib in Untreated ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 2017;377(9):829-838. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1704795
Peters S, Camidge DR, Shaw AT, et al. Alectinib versus Crizotinib in Untreated ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 2017;377(9):829-838. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1704795
Peters S, Camidge DR, Shaw AT, et al. Alectinib versus Crizotinib in Untreated ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 2017;377(9):829-838. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1704795
Alectinib vs crizotinib in ALK+ NSCLC (J-ALEX):
an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial
:::free
- Multi-center trial conducted in Japan
- 103 vs 104 patients
- Chemotherapy-naive or had received one previous chemotherapy regimen
- Agents:
- alectinib 300 mg BID
- crizotinib 250 mg BID
- Primary endpoint: PFS :::split | Outcome | Alectinib | Crizotinib | | ---------------------------------------- | ------------------------- | ----------------------------- | | Median PFS | Not estimated | 10.2 months (95% CI 8.2-12.0) | | Hazard ratio | 0.34 (99.7% CI 0.17-0.71) | - | | Grade 3 or 4 adverse events | 27 (26%) of 103 | 54 (52%) of 104 | | Dose interruptions due to adverse events | 30 (29%) of 103 | 77 (74%) of 104 | | DC of study drug due to AEs | 9 (9%) | 21 (20%) |
- Alectinib dose (300 mg twice daily) is lower than the approved dose in countries other than Japan :::
Hida T, Nokihara H, Kondo M, et al. Alectinib versus crizotinib in patients with ALK -positive non-small-cell lung cancer (J-ALEX): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. The Lancet. 2017;390(10089):29-39. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30565-2
(A), by line of treatment (B), and by disease stage (C). Hazard ratios were estimated by a stratified Cox analysis
:::free
:::split
:::
Hida T, Nokihara H, Kondo M, et al. Alectinib versus crizotinib in patients with ALK -positive non-small-cell lung cancer (J-ALEX): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. The Lancet. 2017;390(10089):29-39. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30565-2
Alectinib versus crizotinib in untreated Asian patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (ALESIA)
:::free
- Design:
- Phase 3, Randomized
- Open-label,
- Recruiting only Asian: China, South Korea, and Thailand
- Number of patients: 187
- Asian patients
- asymptomatic CNS metastases were permitted
:::split
- Agent:
- Alectinib (600 mg twice per day)
- Crizotinib (250 mg)
-
Treatment line: First-line treatment for ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer
-
Trial Name or NCT Number: NCT02838420
:::
Zhou C, Kim SW, Reungwetwattana T, et al. Alectinib versus crizotinib in untreated Asian patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (ALESIA): a randomised phase 3 study. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. 2019;7(5):437-446. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30053-0
- Comparison of two groups: | Endpoint | Alectinib | Crizotinib | | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------- | --------------------------------------- | | Investigator-assessed progression-free survival | HR 0·22, 95% CI 0·13-0·38, p<0·0001 | Median PFS not estimable vs 11·1 months | | Independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival | HR 0·37, 0·22-0·61, p<0·0001 | Not reported | | Objective response | 91% of 125 | 77% of 62 | | Duration of response | HR 0·22, 95% CI 0·12-0·40, p<0·0001 | Not reported | | Time to CNS progression | Cause-specific HR 0·14 | Not reported | | CNS objective response (measurable or non-measurable baseline CNS lesions) | 73% of 44 patients | 22% of 23 patients | | Grade 3-5 adverse events | 29% of 125 | 48% of 62 | | Serious adverse events | 15% of 125 | 26% of 62 |
Zhou C, Kim SW, Reungwetwattana T, et al. Alectinib versus crizotinib in untreated Asian patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (ALESIA): a randomised phase 3 study. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. 2019;7(5):437-446. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30053-0
OS
Zhou C, Kim SW, Reungwetwattana T, et al. Alectinib versus crizotinib in untreated Asian patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (ALESIA): a randomised phase 3 study. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. 2019;7(5):437-446. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30053-0
Zhou C, Kim SW, Reungwetwattana T, et al. Alectinib versus crizotinib in untreated Asian patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (ALESIA): a randomised phase 3 study. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. 2019;7(5):437-446. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30053-0
Alectinib versus chemotherapy in crizotinib pretreated anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer
:::free
- Design:
- Trial phase: III, Multi-center
- Randomized, Open-label
- Number of patients: 107
- Advanced/metastatic ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer patients
- Previously treated with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy and crizotinib
:::split
- Agent:
- Alectinib 600 mg twice daily
- or chemotherapy (pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 or docetaxel 75 mg/m2, both every 3 weeks)
-
Treatment line: Patients who have progressed on, or were intolerant to, crizotinib
-
Trial Name or NCT Number:
ALUR
, NCT02604342
:::
Novello S, Mazières J, Oh IJ, et al. Alectinib versus chemotherapy in crizotinib-pretreated anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: results from the phase III ALUR study. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(6):1409-1416. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy121
Outcome
Outcome | Alectinib | Chemotherapy |
---|---|---|
PFS by investigator assessment, | 9.6 months (95% CI:6.9-12.2) | 1.4 months (95% CI:1.3-1.6) |
PFS by Independent Review Committee assessment | 7.1 months (95% CI:6.3-10.8) | 1.6 months (95% CI:1.3-4.1) |
CNS ORR | 54.2% | 0% |
Novello S, Mazières J, Oh IJ, et al. Alectinib versus chemotherapy in crizotinib-pretreated anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: results from the phase III ALUR study. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(6):1409-1416. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy121
Brigatinib
2nd generation ALKi
ALTA-1L
, ALTA-2L
Brigatinib versus Crizotinib in ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
:::free
- phase III, Open-label
- Randomized
- 275 patients, 1:1
- Advanced ALK-positive NSCLC patients
- not previously received ALK inhibitors
- Brigatinib 180 mg QD
- 7-day lead-in period at 90 mg
- Crizotinib 250 mg BID :::split | Outcome | Brigatinib | Crizotinib | | ------------------ | ---------------------- | ---------------------- | | Estimated 12m PFS: | 67% (95% CI, 56 to 75) | 43% (95% CI, 32 to 53) | | ORR | 71% (95% CI, 62 to 78) | 60% (95% CI, 51 to 68) | | Intracranial RR | 78% (95% CI, 52 to 94) | 29% (95% CI, 11 to 52) |
- Trial:
ALTA-1L
NCT02737501 :::
Camidge DR, Kim HR, Ahn MJ, et al. Brigatinib versus Crizotinib in ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 2018;379(21):2027-2039. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1810171
Outcome
Camidge DR, Kim HR, Ahn MJ, et al. Brigatinib versus Crizotinib in ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 2018;379(21):2027-2039. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1810171
Survival without intracranial disease progression with brain metastasis at baseline
:::free :::split the confirmed rate of intracranial response among patients with measurable lesions was 78% (95% CI, 52 to 94) and 29% (95% CI, 11 to 52), respectively. :::
Camidge DR, Kim HR, Ahn MJ, et al. Brigatinib versus Crizotinib in ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 2018;379(21):2027-2039. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1810171
Brigatinib in Patients With Advanced ALK-Positive NSCLC Who Progressed on Alectinib or Ceritinib
!!!note Median PFS 3.8 in this Phase 2 trial
Ou SHI, Nishio M, Ahn MJ, et al. Efficacy of Brigatinib in Patients With Advanced ALK-Positive NSCLC Who Progressed on Alectinib or Ceritinib: ALK in Lung Cancer Trial of brigAtinib-2 (ALTA-2). Journal of Thoracic Oncology. 2022;17(12):1404-1414. doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2022.08.018
In this study: ALK fusion and EML4 fusion detected at baseline in patients receiving previous alectinib or previous ceritinib
Ou SHI, Nishio M, Ahn MJ, et al. Efficacy of Brigatinib in Patients With Advanced ALK-Positive NSCLC Who Progressed on Alectinib or Ceritinib: ALK in Lung Cancer Trial of brigAtinib-2 (ALTA-2). Journal of Thoracic Oncology. 2022;17(12):1404-1414. doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2022.08.018
Brigatinib Versus Alectinib in ALK-Positive NSCLC After Disease Progression on Crizotinib: Results of Phase 3 ALTA-3 Trial
Brigatinib was not superior to alectinib for PFS in crizotinib-pretreated ALK+ NSCLC
Yang JCH, Liu G, Lu S, et al. Brigatinib Versus Alectinib in ALK-Positive NSCLC After Disease Progression on Crizotinib: Results of Phase 3 ALTA-3 Trial. Journal of Thoracic Oncology. 2023;18(12):1743-1755. doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2023.08.010
Ceritinib
Yet another 2nd generation ALKi
ASCEND-5
First-line ceritinib versus platinum-based chemotherapy
ASCEND-4
- Design: Randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial involving 134 centers across 28 countries.
- Number of patients: 376 patients were randomly assigned to ceritinib (n=189) or chemotherapy (n=187).
- Patients characteristics: Untreated patients with stage IIIB/IV ALK-rearranged non-squamous NSCLC.
- Agent: Oral ceritinib 750 mg/day or platinum-based chemotherapy ([cisplatin 75 mg/m2 or carboplatin AUC 5-6 plus pemetrexed 500 mg/m2] every 3 weeks for four cycles followed by maintenance pemetrexed).
- Treatment line: First-line treatment.
Soria JC, Tan DSW, Chiari R, et al. First-line ceritinib versus platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced ALK -rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (ASCEND-4): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. The Lancet. 2017;389(10072):917-929. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30123-X
First-line ceritinib versus platinum-based chemotherapy
PFS 16.6 vs 8.1
the rapid development and approval of other next generation ALK inhibitor has diluted the importance of this finding.
Soria JC, Tan DSW, Chiari R, et al. First-line ceritinib versus platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced ALK -rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (ASCEND-4): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. The Lancet. 2017;389(10072):917-929. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30123-X
First-line ceritinib versus platinum-based chemotherapy
:::free
OS
:::split :::
Soria JC, Tan DSW, Chiari R, et al. First-line ceritinib versus platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced ALK -rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (ASCEND-4): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. The Lancet. 2017;389(10072):917-929. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30123-X
Lorlatinib
3rd generation ALKi
CROWN 👑
First-Line Lorlatinib or Crizotinib in Advanced ALK-Positive Lung Cancer
:::free
-
Phase 3, Randomized
-
Multi-center, Open-label
-
Number of patients: 296
- Advanced ALK-positive NSCLC
- Received no previous systemic treatment for metastatic disease
:::split
Agent
- Lorlatinib, 100 mg once daily
- Crizotinib, 250mg BID
-
Treatment line: First-line treatment for advanced ALK-positive NSCLC
-
Trial Name or NCT Number:
CROWN 👑
ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03052608 :::
Shaw AT, Bauer TM, de Marinis F, et al. First-Line Lorlatinib or Crizotinib in Advanced ALK-Positive Lung Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020;383(21):2018-2029. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2027187
- Comparison of two groups: | Endpoint | Lorlatinib | Crizotinib | | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------- | ---------------------- | | Progression-free survival at 12 months | 78% (95% CI, 70 to 84) | 39% (95% CI, 30 to 48) | | Hazard ratio for disease progression or death | 0.28 (95% CI, 0.19 to 0.41) | Not reported | | Objective response | 76% (95% CI, 68 to 83) | 58% (95% CI, 49 to 66) | | Intracranial response (among patients with measurable brain metastases) | 82% (95% CI, 57 to 96) | 23% (95% CI, 5 to 54) | | Intracranial complete response | 71% | Not reported |
Shaw AT, Bauer TM, de Marinis F, et al. First-Line Lorlatinib or Crizotinib in Advanced ALK-Positive Lung Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020;383(21):2018-2029. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2027187
Shaw AT, Bauer TM, de Marinis F, et al. First-Line Lorlatinib or Crizotinib in Advanced ALK-Positive Lung Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020;383(21):2018-2029. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2027187
Cumulative Incidence of CNS Progression as First Event
Shaw AT, Bauer TM, de Marinis F, et al. First-Line Lorlatinib or Crizotinib in Advanced ALK-Positive Lung Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020;383(21):2018-2029. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2027187
Shaw AT, Bauer TM, de Marinis F, et al. First-Line Lorlatinib or Crizotinib in Advanced ALK-Positive Lung Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020;383(21):2018-2029. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2027187
Timeline in the development of the AEs of lorlatiib
:::free :::split :::
Ou SHI, Lee ATM, Nagasaka M. From preclinical efficacy to 2022 (36.7 months median follow -up) updated CROWN trial, lorlatinib is the preferred 1st-line treatment of advanced ALK+ NSCLC. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology. 2023;187:104019. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104019 Bauer TM, Felip E, Solomon BJ, et al. Clinical Management of Adverse Events Associated with Lorlatinib. Oncologist. 2019;24(8):1103-1110. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0380
Compare Trials of ALKi
Schematic total PFS comparison
Ou SHI, Lee ATM, Nagasaka M. From preclinical efficacy to 2022 (36.7 months median follow -up) updated CROWN trial, lorlatinib is the preferred 1st-line treatment of advanced ALK+ NSCLC. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology. 2023;187:104019. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104019
ALK inhibitor versus chemotherapy, outcome: 1.1 Progression-free survival subgrouped by line of treatment
ALK inhibitor versus chemotherapy, outcome: 1.16 Overall survival subgrouped by line of treatment
Next-generation ALK inhibitor versus crizotinib, outcome: 2.1 Progressionfree survival subgrouped by type of ALK inhibitor
Next-generation ALK inhibitor versus crizotinib, outcome: 2.3 Overall adverse events subgrouped by type of ALK inhibitor
Resistance
of ALKi
Mechanisms of resistance of ALKi
:::free
:::split
:::
Dagogo-Jack I, Shaw AT. Crizotinib resistance: implications for therapeutic strategies. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(Suppl 3):iii42-iii50. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdw305
Impact of EML4-ALK Variant on Resistance Mechanisms and Clinical Outcomes in ALK-Positive Lung Cancer
Lin JJ, Zhu VW, Yoda S, et al. Impact of EML4-ALK Variant on Resistance Mechanisms and Clinical Outcomes in ALK-Positive Lung Cancer. JCO. 2018;36(12):1199-1206. doi:10.1200/JCO.2017.76.2294
PFS by EML4-ALK v1 versus v3 detected by cDNA (CROWN, ALEX, ALTAl-1L)
Ou SHI, Lee ATM, Nagasaka M. From preclinical efficacy to 2022 (36.7 months median follow -up) updated CROWN trial, lorlatinib is the preferred 1st-line treatment of advanced ALK+ NSCLC. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology. 2023;187:104019. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104019
Secondary Mutations within EML4-ALK
EML4-ALK cDNA clones prepared from sputum specimens obtained from our patient before crizotinib treatment and from pleural-effusion specimens obtained after relapse. :::free :::split :::
Choi YL, Soda M, Yamashita Y, et al. EML4-ALK Mutations in Lung Cancer That Confer Resistance to ALK Inhibitors. New England Journal of Medicine. 2010;363(18):1734-1739. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1007478 Lovly CM, Pao W. Escaping ALK Inhibition: Mechanisms of and Strategies to Overcome Resistance. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4(120). doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3003728
Characteristics of the pooled population of 450 ALK inhibitor resistant
Koopman B, Groen HJM, Schuuring E, et al. Actionability of on-target ALK Resistance Mutations in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Local Experience and Review of the Literature. Clinical Lung Cancer. 2022;23(2):e104-e115. doi:10.1016/j.cllc.2021.06.011
Clinical Benefit for ALK Resistance Mutations From Sequential ALK Inhibitors
Koopman B, Groen HJM, Schuuring E, et al. Actionability of on-target ALK Resistance Mutations in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Local Experience and Review of the Literature. Clinical Lung Cancer. 2022;23(2):e104-e115. doi:10.1016/j.cllc.2021.06.011
Recondo G, Facchinetti F, Olaussen KA, Besse B, Friboulet L. Making the first move in EGFR-driven or ALK-driven NSCLC: first-generation or next-generation TKI? Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15(11):694-708. doi:10.1038/s41571-018-0081-4
Take Home Message
:::free
健保 2023-11-01
- Lorlatinib與alectinib、ceritinib、crizotinib、brigatinib用於ALK陽性之晚期非小細胞肺癌第一線治療時,僅得擇一使用
- Lorlatinib: Excellent CNS activity
- Lorlatinib AEs: hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, cognitive AEs, peripheral neuropathy, and edema
- Resistance of ALKi: Variant 3 and G1202R :::split :::split :::
Singh N, Jaiyesimi IA, Ismaila N, et al. Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Driver Alterations: ASCO Living Guideline, Version 2023.1. JCO. 2023;41(15):e42-e50. doi:10.1200/JCO.23.00281