🌱 created from: hepatocellular carcinoma
systemic_therapies-of-hepatocellular_carcinoma
Summary of Clinical Trials for Liver Cancer Treatments
-
Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab vs. Sorafenib
- Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab (C-P Class A only) improves OS vs. sorafenib (median OS 19.2 vs. 13.4 mos)
- Ref: IMbrave 150, NEJM 2020;382:1894; JCO 2021; 39(3_suppl):267
- Evaluate & treat esophageal varices before initiating treatment
- OS benefit seen in antidrug antibody (ADA) negative patients but not ADA positive patients
- Ref: Cancer Research 2021;81(13_suppl):CT185
- Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab (C-P Class A only) improves OS vs. sorafenib (median OS 19.2 vs. 13.4 mos)
-
Sorafenib vs. Placebo
- Sorafenib (C-P Class A only) improves OS vs. placebo (median OS 10.7 vs. 7.9 mos)
- Ref: SHAPR, NEJM 2008;359:378; Lancet Oncol 2009;10:25
- May be considered for C-P class B7
- Sorafenib (C-P Class A only) improves OS vs. placebo (median OS 10.7 vs. 7.9 mos)
-
Lenvatinib vs. Sorafenib
- Lenvatinib (C-P Class A only) is noninferior to sorafenib (median OS 13.6 vs. 12.3 mos)
- Ref: REFLECT, Lancet 2018:391:1163
- Lenvatinib (C-P Class A only) is noninferior to sorafenib (median OS 13.6 vs. 12.3 mos)
Treatment | Median OS (months) | Reference(s) |
---|---|---|
Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab | 19.2 | IMbrave 150, NEJM 2020; JCO 2021 |
Sorafenib | 13.4 | Cancer Research 2021 |
Sorafenib (vs. Placebo) | 10.7 | SHAPR, NEJM 2008; Lancet Oncol 2009 |
Lenvatinib | 12.3 | REFLECT, Lancet 2018 |